Tomorrow America celebrates the election of its first black (ok, partially black) President.  Tomorrow I celebrate the fact that the Obama Administration only has 100 days until it must start to take responsibility for their actions during the previous administration. The failure to reign in GSEs such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which rests not only with Democrats but with Republicans as well, being one of them. The Housing Bubble has burst, just like the S&L bubble and the dot-com bubble.  But, unlike these previous economic slow-downs, turn-downs, recessions or whatever you want to call it, there has been no quick rebound, such as the one seen after the dot-com bubble burst or after 911.  Why?  Not pointing any fingers, but certain political groups do not want the economy to make a comeback unless they can be seen as the driving force behind such a recovery.  How do they do this?  By allowing fear and panic to remain in the public's mind as long as possible, by telling everyone that it will not get better unless they do something drastic, like spending billions of dollars.  What's worse is that some of those who are now our "saviors" are directly or indirectly responsible for the current economic situation.

Please, for a moment, set aside political idealism and party affiliation and look at the facts.  The economy did quite well under President Clinton.  Much praise for Clinton has been branded about by certain people as of late (no one on this forum, my boss loved Clinton), but the fact that for six of his eight years in office the Congress was controlled my a majority of Republicans seems to elude some.  George W Bush had large shoes to fill after beating (or cheating, who cares) Al Gore.  He came into office with an economy that was slumping due to various factors and eventually lost a great deal of momentum after 911.  But, the economy rebounded and did quite well for some time afterward, it did not climb to Regan-esque or Clintonian levels, but it wasn't slumping as bad as it was right after 911.  Then, the midterm elections came about and many Republicans were voted out of office in favor of Democrats.  And now after six years of a majority Democrat Congress we are at the brink, if you believe the hype, of another Great Depression.  And What can save us?

Only two things Regan-esque economic decisions or another World War.  FDR didn't save us with the New Deal, WWII is what pulled the US out of the Great Depression.  And Jimmy Carter's horrific fiscal polices were only rectified by a Reganomics.

You have 100 days Mr. President.  You have 100 days Speaker Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Reid. You have 100 days Team Obama.  Make them count, enjoy them, because in 101 days you must all stand up and take responsibility for what you, and some of your fellow Congressmen/women  and Senators from across the aisle have done to this country and our economic future.

Ok, it's been a while since I last posted.... a lot has been going on.  Mostly it was the Holidays.  Thanksgiving, Christmas, and soon to come New Years Eve/Day...  Oh what fun it is to ride 300 miles to visit family.... or something like that.

So, I keep hearing certain relatives of mine referring to Bush as if they were hardcore leftists.  Here I though I came from more conservative stock....  Shocking.... No?  On one hand I have my grandpa talking about how the New Deal made things worse and yet he hopes that Barack and Co. will some how get it right......  Hmmmm.  Interesting. A Great Uncle and Uncle and I were all talking politics and one of them says that he voted for Barack... because he couldnt vote for McBush the Third.... not because Barack is the best man for the job, no, because hes not a Republican.... and then, it gets better, he says that Barack made all his money while living overseas.... and that Barack grew up a poor black child.

Thats when it hits me square in the face... my family only watches the MSM and, unlike me, never tune into conservative talk radio...  I just couldnt let the "poor black boy" thing slide, after all Barack isnt exactly Steve Martin (if you get it you do, if not, you dont).  My Great Uncle and Uncle were shcoked to find out that Barack was raise more as a rich white kid than poor black boy.... I wonder what else they missed out on?  Tony Rezkp, Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers?  (If I spelled someones name wrong, please dont thinks its because I'm not educated, its because I dont care about them or repsect them enough to spell it right.)

Thnak GOD the Holidays are almost over.... I dont think I can take much more...

Hey, Barack! Where's my bail out?  Before you go giving Ford, GM and Chrysler a big check, why not give it to those of us who need it the most, the middle class you supposedly care about?  Want to "stimulate the economy" give all of us a chunk of that $25 billion.  "I think its good when you spread the wealth around," OK spread some wealth my way.

I haven't really agreed with the bail outs.  I think its crazy to just keep handing out money left and right to everyone who asks for it.  It's a free market economy, let the market self regulate.  Of course the government got the banks into this mess, so they should get them out, to a degree.  But, not by taxing all of us into the poor house.  Why not cut government spending by cutting pay for all three branches of the Federal government?  These guys dont run in elections for the money, its for the power, so why not make them pay for their mistakes?

As far as Ford, GM and Chrysler go... let them eat transfer case. (LOL)  I think it would actually be good for all three if they went belly up. They could renegotiate union contracts if not completely do away with the UAW, thus reducing the manufacturing costs of the cars and trucks ther produce which would allow them to actually turn a profit...  That and anyone who knows anything about war mobilization knows that the DOD doesnt want Detroit going out of business and scraping their huge steel stamping facilities to try and produce cheap platic cars that run on batteries.  We need those plants just incase we have another international war, ie WWIII.  Think about it, who is better prepared to switch over to a war time production base;  Ford or Hyundai?

Give me (and the rest of the downtrodden, desolet, disspondent middle class) some of that 25billion...

Read Neal Stephenson's "Snowcrash" and "Diamond Age"......  Both are oddly accurate in describing the future we may all live in very shortly. 

I'm currently re-reading Robert A Heinlein's SciFi classic "Starship Troopers" and I'm amazed by Heinlein's insight into the direction this country was taking and what the end consequences may be.  "Starship Troopers" was originally published in 1959 and is still highly popular today.  There is a quote I'd like to point out for those who have never read  this book and for those who have and glossed over the political and psychological/social aspects of the book.

"      "This very personal relationship, 'value,' has two factors for a human being: first, what he can do with a thing, its use to him . . . and second, what he must do to get it, its cost to him.  There is an old song which asserts 'the best things in life are free.'  Not true! Utterly false!  This was the tragic fallacy which brought on the decadence and collapse of the democracies of the twentieth century; those noble experiments failed because the people had been led to believe that they could simply vote for whatever they wanted . . . and get it, without toil, without sweat, without tears.
       "Nothing of value is free.  Even the breath of life is purchased at birth only through gasping effort and pain."... "

This excerpt is taken from Chapter Six of the book during which the main character recalls a lecture given to him during a class called History and Moral Philosophy.  This excerpt comes after the teacher completely shatters the concepts of communism and socialism.  Isn't it interesting that a SciFi book written in 1959 can fortell the downfall of western democracy

Heinlein warns of people becoming to dependent on governemnt.  He also warns of the effects of the lack of effective corporal punishment in society.  In Heinlein's future the Terran Federation meets out punishments that fit the crime in a very public manner; lashing.  He speaks of law abiding citizens being affraid to enter public parks after dark for fear of being attacked by gangs in the Twentieth Century... that was in the realtively ordered late 1950's.  Fourty-nine years later, how far off are we from Heinlein's predicted outcome of people not being able to enter parks after dark for fear of violent attacks?

Americans have just elected a very liberal, very unexperienced junior Senator from one of the most politically corrupt areas of the country.  He achieved this by hiding his liberal agenda behind a mask of pseudo-conservatism and managed to convince many that they could get many things for free just by voting for it.  Free healthcare.... vote for Barack and you got it, of course someone else must actually pay for it.  Free money...  vote for Barack "Robin Hood" Obama and he will steal from the rich (those who make over $250,000) and give to the poor (95% of working Americans, most of which pay little to no taxes to begin with).  Vote for Barack and get it all free; without toil, without sweat, with out tears....   

I keep hearing about the youth vote.  I am the youth vote.  I, on the other hand, am not your typical youth in this nation.  I was raised to have certain values and morals and I have done my best to hold on to these moral and values.  I'm no saint, that's for sure.  I'm also not the best conservative in the world...  I think we need to legalize marijuana; it would be a massive source of revenue for the government and its legalization would reduce crime and hard drug use (cocaine, heroine, etc.).  I think we need to legalize prostitution; you can't legislate morality and you can't stop the world's oldest profession, plus it would cut back on the number of STDs contracted.  I also believe that even if the pro-lifers manage to over turn Roe v. Wade that abortions will still occur, states could then pass legislation that would replace Roe v. Wade, which is how it should be anyway... But, I digress.

Why did Barack win the youth vote?  There are several reasons.

1.  Liberal universities, colleges, and schools.  Students who were raised by conservative families can spend up to 17 years in classrooms being indoctrinated by liberal teachers and professors.  This is more likely to happen at the university/college level, but there are plenty of liberal elementary, middle, and high school teachers.  In universities across the nation the "youth" are encouraged to go out and make their own paths, to throw off what they have been taught their whole life and decide what their values and principals are, to become independent of their parents and grandparents belief system.  Some are able to keep their conservative viewpoint, but many succumb to peer pressure.  Having been taught thier whole lives to respect their elders and to listne to their advice these impressionalbe youth are easy targets for thier liberal professors and classmates.

2.  Our "American Idol" society.  Obessed with pop culture icons, the youth of this nation are easily influeneced by the "star power" of a candidate.  This election was turned in "So you think you can govern" by the MSM and the liberal blogoshpere.  Sarah Palin's RNC sponsored shopping spree and pregnant teen became more important election issues than Barac Obama's questionable associations with anit-semites and terrorists.  John McCain's lack of computer savy was more imortant than Barack lack of political savy.  And while Obama wanted to get back to the "real issues" the MSM and the liberal blogosphere made sure that the issues of how how many home Cind McCain owns and Sarah Palin's abilities as a huntress were well known.

These are just two of the reasons that the "youth" vote went for Barack.  A majority of the youth vote maybe, but not all of us "youth" are so illinformed and easily swayed in our opinions and values.  A few words of wisdom for older conservatives and politicians; dont water down the conservative message and dont stop telling the "youth" what that message means for them.  I think that us conservative need to start campaigning for 2010 and 2012 right now.  Lets do our best to encourage a "new" generation of conservatives to do their part in making this country great once again.

Let's take a look at what Barack's first, and only, term of President will be like....

Baracks politics of change.... yeah right.  He selected Ron Emmanuele for Chief of Staff. Thats change we can all beleive in right?  Change to what, another Clinton?  If he really wanted to change things, why not some new faces? 

Under the guise of "tax cuts" for "the poor" Barack will raise taxes.  "But he said he would cut taxes..."  Yeah, he said that when he was trying to get your vote, and after he did he said that "We're all gonna have to make sacrifices..."  You heard the man.  By either raising taxes outright or by letting the Bush Tax Cuts sunset Barack, and the other Democraps will raise EVERYONE'S taxes.  And please, dont say that he said that it wasnt raising taxes... what he said was "It will be like going back to tax rates under President Clinton."  That my friends is a tax increase, not a tax cut.  But, people view the Clinton years as one of the greatest periods of economic security, and therefore Clinton tax levels are a good thing.....  Bush tax levels are even lower on almost ever socio-economic group, but I guess that isn't good enough for some of us.  Oh, by the way, how exactly does one cut taxes for someone who doesnt really pay taxes?  Does that make sense to anyone?  If it does, please stop drinking the kool-aid, its bad for you and creates a negative sterotype....  What this "tax cut" really ammounts to is another government hand out, aka WELFARE.

Do you like conservative talk radio?  You might want to get in as much of it as you can....  Baracks's appointee to the FCC will most likely team up with the other Democraps on the board to inforce the Fairness Doctrine, which is "supposed" to give equal time to opposing political view points.  Of course we wont see "equality" in the MSM, and any we do will not be truly equal.  It is conservative talk radio that we have to worry about and the internet and sites just like Townhall.com.  Hopefully if the unFairness Doctrine gets passed then they will have to take everything as a whole, not individual shows and websites.  If not then at least HuffingtonPost will have to let some real conservatives post articles, not neocon solialist freaks like the ones on the staff...  And maybe if elRushbo is kicked off the air he'll go to XM and gve all of his regualr listeners a free subscription...

Barack will surpass Hitler as the man responsible for the most deaths. "How?"  By passing the Freedom of Choice Act wich will surpass Roe v Wade as the national defenition of a legal abortion.  The Freedom of Choice Act will completely undo all of the hard work done by the pro-life movement.  It will make it unconstitutional for states to pass laws that deny a "woman's right to choose".  It will end bans on partial birth abortions and overturn abortion limits across the board.  Abortions will not be "legal, safe, and rare."  They will be common and still as dangerous as ever, all they will be is LEGAL.

Affirmative action...  Many think that this is now a deunked theory because we elected Barack, a black man, to the office of President of the United States.... if only that were true.  While listening to one of my favorite talk shows today I heard a comment from the host's assistant or engineer or whatever (a black man, BTW) say that it isnt over because Barack is half white.  This will be the argument from now on.  You should all be prepared to have to defend yourselves if you say something like "afirmative action is pointles now because we have a black giuy in the white house."  You'll get an answer like "He's not black, he's half black.  His white half is what got him elected."  one of my co-workers, a young black male said that Barack wasn't black, "he's a mutt."  Under Barack affirmative action will probably get worse.

National security.... The Kenyans already EXPECT a lot out of their brother Barack.  LOL.  Joe the VP stated that a generated international crisis will occur within 6 months of Barack taking office and the President of Afghanistan has laready said that he hopes President Obabma will help put and end to civilian casualties in Afghanistan...  Barack will jerk US troops out of Iraw so fast it'll make the camels' heads spin and then its a sitting duck.  If the Iranians try to invade again the Iraqis wont be able to stop them.  Then we have an even larger enemy to deal with, after all, iran "is only a tiny country" unless it makes territorial aquisitions such as Iraq, which pust it a lot, lot close the Saudia Arabia......   If Russia goes crazy and invades another country what do you think Barack's gonna do?  Stand up to them the way a Ronald Reegan would? no, hell probably just tell both sides to calm down.

All in all Barack is going to devestate this country.  i dont have the time to get into the economic problems he wil lcause if he lives up to half his campaign promises or go more in depth into certain other things, but hes going to go down as the worst president in history.... He's gonna make Bush look like JFK...

It came to me last night....  ACORN is registering 2nd graders because they admire Barack.  Why do 2nd graders admire Barack?  Because he stole Bob The Builder's catch phrase.  "Can we build it?  Yes We Can" became "Can we change it?  Yes we can." then just "Yes We Can". Of course 2nd graders, and others of similar intelligence levels, admire Barack, he appeals to their basic instinct to admire one who mindelssly repeats empty catch phrases that can be easily repeated.  Barack has extended his cadre of catch phrases.  "I'm going to lower taxes for 95% of Americans"  and "JMac wants to cut medicare" are some of them, but lets not forget the most important "I think when you spread the wealth arround it's good for everyone."  Ask a Barack supporter why he is supporting Barack and they will say its because he wants "Hope" and "Change" and "At least he's not Bush."  Ask a McCain supporter why they support McCain and you will hear various answers.  Ask why they dont support Barack and you will hear that he is "unexpereince" or "will ruin the economy" or becasue he "wants to spread the wealth arround" quickly followed by, if they are white, and explination that it's not because he's black and that that has nothing to do with it.

Colin Powell can't even say that he is supporting Barack because of race, but yet the libs are making attacks daily that it is the "racists rednecks who cling to guna and religion" who will cost Barack the election.  Yay, lets play the race card. Again and again and again...  That's just great isn't it?  A black man can't say that his true reason for supporting another black man is because he is black, but it is ok to say over and over again that "they are gonna try to make you affraid of me, because I have a funny name and I don't look like the other guys on the currency."

Barack the Builder.  Building class envy and racial discorse for political purposes.  I don't think Nick Jr would play that one, I don't even think PBS would show that one.....

I can just imagine what must have been being said in Democrat strategy meetings, "I've got an idea; let's work with groups like ACORN and Fannie Mae to make banks hand out sub prime loans like lollipops, that will eventually cause the home credit markets to collapse which will ripple all the way through Wall Street.  Then we will promise the American people to lower their taxes, well most of them anyway, and give them all free health care.  Then as things get worse and worse they will have to rely on the government more and more.  Eventually, they will have no choice but to turn to us for their every need."

Yeah, thats a great plan, if your name is Joseph Stalin or Karl Marx.  And I'm sure most of us have heard about Hawaii by now...  For those who haven't 7 months after initiating their statewide child health insurance program the state has had to kill the program.  Why?  Because parents who were buying health coverage for their kids dropped them so that they qualified for the state program.  Strange, people not paying for something when they can get it for free, never saw that coming...  I bet the MSM wont be covering that story.

Last week in Ohio Barack Hussein Obama unwittingly unleahsed the Socialist Democrats plan while speaking with "Joe the plumber."  I know some plumbers and lets face it, some of the aint the smartest guys on the planet, but hell even Joe saw Barack and the Dems' plan for what it was: SOCIALISIM.  "..I think that when you spread the wealth arroung, it's goos for everyone."  Thats what BHO said to Joe after joe asked him about his "middle class tax releif plan".  He gets it, but another person I know (who happens to have a PolySci degree) doesn't, in fact he loves socailist programs and thinks more things need to be socialized...  Makes me sick to my stomach.

I don't make $250,000 a year, but I don't think it's fair to take even more from these people.  I dont think it's fair how much the IRS takes from me, and I get back half of what they take every tax season... I can't imagine what it must be like to have them take an even greater ammount and not get a good schunk of that back every year.  What I do think is fair is the Fair Tax.   I know some people who have argued against it because "if you pass an amendment that oveturns the federal income tax you also affect stae income taxes" or "a federal consumption tax just doesn't seem fair, and what to stop the government from upping the tax rate".  These are both valid concerns, but not valid arguments against the Fair Tax.  States have the right to set their own taxes, which they all do.  And the thing that will keep the government from raising this tax rate will be the fact that the government will see increased tax revenue from the Fair Tax... but I digress.

Where was I going with all this?  I don't even know anymore....  Oh yeah.  Barack = Socaialism

I had someone tell me earlier tonight that they think that all necessities should be socialized: electric, water, health care, etc.  The scarier part is that this person doesn't care how much of their money goes to the government in taxes as long as it helps someone because "there are people who can not or will not help themselves..."  For another American to say that to me is deeply disturbing, this is supposed to be the land of opportunity where anyone who is willing to work can be successful.  Even after I said that socialism doesn't work on  a large scale, which has been proven time and time again (think the USSR and China before the realized that they needed some capitalism to make the system work) this person said that it was because of... survey says GREED!

I'm sorry, but greed is not always bad.  Greed drives business, greed is the basis for competition, because lets face it, when it comes to business the scoreboard doesn't record touchdowns and PAT's it records profits and profit margins.  If I had had $50,000 to invest in any company during the second fiscal quater I would have bought stock in Wal-Mart before I would Exxon-Mobile.  Why?  Because, Wal-Mart may have had a lower quaterly profit, but they had a much larger profit margin and therefore a much better chance a business longevity... But I digress.

Let's take a look at Barack's tax plans one more time (lets also keep in mind that I am a college drop out and when I was going it was for Film, not business, not polysci)  BHO plans to increase corporate taxes, increase SSI taxes, increase the death tax, capital gains (except for small businesses), "cut" taxes for 95% of Americans, raise taxes for those making over $250,000, and "renegotiate NAFTA and other trade agreements.

Who pays coporate taxes?  A) Corporations.  B) Consumers. C) The Tax Fairy.  The answer is B, Consumers.  How?  Corportaions pass these taxes on to consumers through price increases.  But what if people stop buying their products or using their services?  Then these companies layoff or fire employees to help keep their costs lower and offset the corporate tax rates.  Which country has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world?  The United States.

Social Security Insurance was origionaly started as a way to get older citizens to reitre earlier and let younger workers become part of the work force.  The system started in a deficit; an entire generation of people who had never contribted to the system were now drawing from it.  Several economist and other analysts have predicted that anyone currently undr the age of 35 will not be able to draw SSI benefits when they are of retirment age.  People are living longer and therefore drawing SSI longer and a system that started in the negative will soon be bankrupt..

How exactly does one cut taxes for people who dont pay taxes to begin with?  Thats not a tax cut, thats a welfare check.  And raising taxes on the top 5% of earners is "fair" its "patriotic" that's bull malarkey.  The top 5% of earners shoulder 70% of the tax burden and now they (the liberals) expect them to take on more. How is that fiar?  They earned that money.  They are the ones who worked for that money.  Why should others get some of thier hard earned money for doing nothing?  These are the people who own small businesses.  Small businesses employ 70% of Americans....  Most small business owners report their comapny's profit as personal income.  What happens if their taxes go up?  They cut jobs.

The net effect of all these things is that unemployment will be higher, tax revenues will be lower and the economy will go from recession to depression.  Can we risk four moe years of a bad economy?  No.  So, if we cant afford four more years, who should we vote for? "Bush 3" as the liberals call JMac or Barack who will make Bush look like Regan or Clinton?  I'm not going to tell you how to vote, that's up to you as an individual to do what you think is right.  I will say that after the election, one way or the other some of us will regret our decsion... I don't think i'll be the least be regretful and i hope others dont have to regret their choice....

I can not believe the things I have been hearing in the news lately.  Actually, I can. I just don't want to.  Sarah Palin accused of encouraging crowds to use "hate speech," liberal media elitists saying she should be censured, and many other saying that "if Barack Hussein Obama loses this election it will be because of racism in America."

Now, far be it for me, a Southern Conservative, to say this, but aren't comments like that inherently racist?  Just follow my line of thought for a minute;  people are saying bad things about Barack at campaign rallies... and it's the GOP race baiting when no one has said anything even close to a racial epithat?  A black liberal woman says that Palin needs to be censured... for what exactly?  It's not like Palin is out there bropping N-bombs all over the place... like most rappers....  And the biggest racist comment of all; if a black man loses the election to a white man then it is instantly because of racism... not because he wasn't able to beat him in the debates or make an effective argument for himself on the campaign trail, but because of racism... isn't that kinda like saying that your candidate's only qualification is his race and therefore only racism can defeat him?

Four or five quick points that have been played to death... but not by me.  I've been hearing it so much and I just have to vent.

1) The Race Card:  Exactly who is it that has been injecting race into this, well for lack of a better term, race?  The Democrats, most notably Barack Hussein Obama.  "They're gonna try to make you scared... of me.  Because I don't look like the other guys on the one dollar and five dollar bills." or "Hey, he's got a funny name... and did I mention.. he's black."  This is blacksploitation on a level Hollywood never dreamed of when it made "Shaft."  Lets get one thing straight right now; Barack H Obabma is not black, he is half black and half white.  He will not be the "first black president" he will be the first mixed-race president.  And I am so tired of Barack supporters saying that McCain and Palin are "race batting" and that those of us who aren't voting for Barack are racist....

2) Barack's Associtations and friends:  William Ayers, Rev. J Wright, Tony Rezko, Jim Johnson, Frank Raines.  An unrepentant domestic terroritst,  an antisemit, and two crooks walk into a bar.. wait its not a joke, its Obama's freinds, mentores, and economic adivisers....  "But he  didn't know that Ayers bombed places and he was only eight, and he never hear J Wright say those things and you only bring up Raines because he's black..."  Whatever.  I think that if I were running for president I'd make sure that my associations and friends had cleaner backgrounds...  Oh but lets not forget that McCain was indicted in the Keating Five scandle and may have been involved in the Iran-Contra affair....

3) "Four more years of Bush":  This is just nonsense.  McCain has voted party line 90% of the time... Barack 96%....  If there was a sitting Dem. president who was as unpopular as Bush and Obama was extolling "hope" and "change" we would probably have never heard about his opponents voting record...

4) "We need to get out of Iraq":  The idea that we are "losing to many men i n war we should have never been in" is crazy.  We have lost less men in Iraq than we did during the Tet offensive in 'Nam.  This is a volunteer army, not drafted.  That means that these men and women volunteered to serve and knew the risks when they signed up.. when the reenlisted............  But, lets follow Barack's lead and bomb Pakistan, our ally.....

There is more, but it's getting late and I've got a bit of a cold and I'm not feeling very well right now so I think I'm gonna just leave it at these four... for now....

Liberals are painting a lovely picture of what our future may look like; everyone has a job, everyone has health care, everyone has affordable housing, everyone has a green car to drive, and everyone is somehow safe, secure and happy.... at least on the surface.

But, what freedoms do liberals expect us to “sacrifice” (which seems to be one of their favorite words) or what must we “patriotically” endure to enjoy this “Brave New Deal.” I have a few ideas. The Freedom of Speech technically eradicated by things such as the “Fairness Doctrine”; the Right to Bear Arms completely eradicated by excessive gun control laws; the Right to Peaceful (please define “peaceful” as many liberal protests are hardly “peaceful” anymore) Assembly eradicated by watchdog groups such as ACORN and the ACLU (which I both like and dislike for various reasons) who just “want to make sure that EVERYONE is treated fairly” as long as EVERYONE is a liberal, a minority, or another member of the proletariat; the right to NOT have an abortion if the child will be born with any birth defects or impairments (think Downs Syndrome or Autism) because the government will be paying for health care; the freedom to be wealthy (after all, if Exxon is making “excessive profits” at a profit margin of less than 7%, then god forbid anyone else make that kind of profit); and many other unforeseeable losses of freedoms... Oh “Brave New Deal” with such people in it!

Can you imagine this world? If not, then just think of places like Communist Russia in its heyday or Communist China (which Barack thinks is a shining example of great infrastructure).

I can also imagine the reactions of people much like myself; gun toting, freedom loving, capitalist pigs (oink oink baby!). Our founding fathers never thought that the government they set in place with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights would ever last this long... which it almost didn't except for the unconstitutional actions of one very famous and revered President named Abe Lincoln (heresy some will undoubtedly say, followed quickly by the use of the words bigot and racist, but I honestly believe that the southern states had the right to secession if they felt that the government was giving them a raw deal.)

Do not doubt, the Revolution is coming. There will be change. But by God it might not be the change Barack and his socialist buddies want or expect. That I can assure you. That I promise you. For if MY nation does become the Unites Socialist States of America, then I will do everything in my power to tear it down brick by brick, even if it means my death and the deaths of those I hold dear. I will call on others like myself to join with me and stand for what is good and right in this country and overthrow this new form of tyranny no matter what the cost, no matter what the sacrifice! On election day join me as I vote against those who hope to change our country into something it should never be and will never be. Vote for freedom, not for socialism....

I work with a few Democrats, actually I'm one of the only Republicans where I work.  One of them is a woman, one is an older white male, one is a younger black male and the other an older black male.  The woman, a mother of one, has decided that she "doesn't care who wins as long as they will actually fix thing" and make things better, but she kind of supports the McCain/Palin ticket because she was impressed by Sarah Palin.  I've been constantly feeding her information gathered from not only Townhall.com but also from my favorite conservative talk radio shows like Rush, Boorts, and Hannity...

The younger black male doesnt really talk polotics much and I have an honest gut feeling that he is voting for Barack just because Barack is black.  Why i feel this way is actually very simple.  I asked who he was voting for, he said Barack, I said WHY? and he said that he just thinks Barack is going to do good things for the country.... No real political backing and I really didnt push the subject because, well because I didn't want to get all super political with a guy I have to work wihth every day.

The older black male backs Barack H Obama as well and cites the Clinton Presidnecy as his reason why he supports Democrats, although I have heard him mutter the occasional reference to no helping the brothers in da hood.... or something like that...

The older white male, who has a PolySci degree from a state univeristy (UNCW... and we all know how liberal that school is), once said "I'd vote for SATAN if he ran on the Democratic ticket."  That shocked me.  It shocked me so bad that I couldn't even frame a response to it right off the top of my head.  He not only thinks that Clinton was the greatest presidnet ever, but also refered to the Illuminati and the Free Masons and pointed out that there have only been two Presidents who were not members of the Free Masons... JFK and guess who.. William Jefferson Clinton....  Now, me personally I dont usualy base my arguments for voting off of such political rhetoric as the Illuminati and the consipracy for world domination that it is supposed to represent... but hey i guess if you can subscribe to that theory then you must also subscribe to the theory that Slick Willy knew that Al Gore didn't stand a snowball's chance of winning the election and therefore ruined the economy to prevent the Republicans from holding office for more than four years and that he then sabatoged his own wife's campaign to prevent her from gaining equality with him... which i know a few conservatives who just might agree with those statements... but very few liberals....

Oh and just in case we all havent heard this nonsenss yet, come November 4th he just might be voting for Satan or well The Antichrist at least..  Yes, this theory is out as well.  Barack H Obama comes out of no where to gain political power and quickly moves up the ranks...  But I digress this is all just right Wing fear mongering, which is only fair seeing as how the left would love us to beleive that McCain is Bush 3 and that he will keep us in Iraq for 100 years.....

Ok.  So this if my first blog.. ever.  I know, a 22 year old with only one blog ever and its on a conservative web site... Odd?  Maybe.

I've been following this election since about this time last year.  I have severed ties with other online communities due to "flame wars" started because of this election and I will not return to these communities because of things that were said about me because of my political views.  For instance, I was called a racist, a sexist, a bigot, a narrow minded neocon and other distasteful things because I had avowed to note vote for either Hilary Clinton or Barack H Obama.  I've said it before and will say it again; if either of those two were conservatives, not even conservative Republicans just conservative in general, I would vote for them.  Does that make me racist?  Sexist?  If so we must now define liberals as a new race and sex of people...  And if we do that then i guess i am a recist, sexist capitalis pig (oink oink baby!)  And, continuing with that line of thought I now must charge Hilary and Barack with playing the sexy race card... or is it racey sex card?  oh well....  And neocon... that a worst insult to me than racist or sexist... I am not a neo-conservative... I may be "new" in some sence to upholding conservative views and principals.... but I am not one of these neocons who have invaded the Republican party after leaving the Dems.....  By the way, if i'm a sexist, than how come on November 4th I will most definetly be casting my ballot for McCain/Palin....?  Riddle me that...

I was never a big suppoter of McCain.  I think he is at times to liberal and to willing to work across the aisle, but he is better than Barack H Obama.  Just curious, is it ok for me to refer to him as Barack H Obama, or is that in some way racist?  I dont really care, because if it is then I have a lot of people that I want to contact and let them know that they are racists because they refer to Pres. Bush as "Dubya"... or mabey thats nameist... I can invent words to... maybe I can be President one day...  Anywho... there I go rambling on again.

The fact of the matter is this; I WILL NOT voter for a man who wants socialized health care, who promises to "lower" taxes on 95% of Americans, and whos running mate says that paying higher taxes is patriotic...  I guess that makes me more patriotic than Barack or Joe because it just so happens that they make just less than what they consider "rich" as which is $250,000... and they make about $200,000... isnt that odd... opppps there I go again rambling, of course I am writing this after working all day and it is after !:00 AM right now...I think I'm gonna go get some sleep and see if i cant put together a well structured sentence in the morning... even in this "state of mind" I know that there arenst 57 states in the union...
Good night and God speed... (that isnt copyrighted is it?)