About Me

Name: Gerald R Evans
Email: geraldrevans@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

I just gotta say this... about global warming.

Global warming... climate change...  whatever you want to call it, its a bunch of bull.  I've had this argument with liberals before.  I've made my points numerous times.  But I have to say it again...

First of all, saying that global warming doesn't exist, that climate change doesn't happen is irresponsible.  The Earth warms and cools, this is irrefutable.  But, to say that Man is alone responsible, or responsible at all, for the rise in the Earth's temperatures is just as irresponsible.  To date there have been no studies that prove, irrefutably, that carbon emissions or other greenhouse gas emissions are the sole cause of Earth's rising temperatures.  By the same token science has, of yet, been able to prove that man does not have an impact...

So where does that leave us?  To me it leaves both sides standing at 20 and a draw always goes to the house and the house in this case is mother nature. 

Since we can neither prove or disprove the theory of "man made global warming" then we must presume, or at least I must, that global warming is a natural phenomena, which it is.  There are various naturally occurring phenomena that contribute to the Earth warming and cooling, such as sun spot activity, changes in solar winds, fluctuations in the Earth's magnetic field, changes in the Earth's tectonic activity, etc. etc....

But, of course the liberal left would have us all believe that we are all responsible for the increases, and somehow decreases, in the Earth's temperatures.  The question that we must ask ourselves now is;  why is it important for the liberals to make us think we are responsible for "climate change"?

The all important Kyoto Protocol calls for countries to purchase carbon credits or offsets for carbon emissions over a certain level, which is actually higher than our current EPA standards.  The proceeds from these carbon credits or offsets are then used to encourage "green industries" in third world countries....

Now, why should the USA sign the Kyoto Protocol if we already meet or exceed the carbon emission levels which it sets forth?  Maybe, the idea is to get American industries to relax their standards of emission control and exceed the Kyoto levels so that American companies and the American government can then purchase carbon credits and therefore fund "green industry" in other nations...  That sounds like a global scheme for wealth redistribution....

That is the reason why the liberal left wants to make you and I  think that we are killing the polar bears and the planet.  Its all one big socialist scam. As we all know, wealth redistribution is one of the socialist agendas.  Of course, it rarely ever works on a large scale, just ask the Russians and probably the Chinese too.

Now, I know that JMac thinks that global warming is a big issue and that we must do something about that, but I also think that his views on global warming are nothing more than him trying to show that he is "in touch" with today and that he "cares about the planet" so he can get some liberal and moderate voters to back him.  Truth be told when the cameras are off he's probably wondering how far into his first term he can go before he says that global warmin is horse manuer..

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I just gotta say this.. about the election. Part two

Four or five quick points that have been played to death... but not by me.  I've been hearing it so much and I just have to vent.

1) The Race Card:  Exactly who is it that has been injecting race into this, well for lack of a better term, race?  The Democrats, most notably Barack Hussein Obama.  "They're gonna try to make you scared... of me.  Because I don't look like the other guys on the one dollar and five dollar bills." or "Hey, he's got a funny name... and did I mention.. he's black."  This is blacksploitation on a level Hollywood never dreamed of when it made "Shaft."  Lets get one thing straight right now; Barack H Obabma is not black, he is half black and half white.  He will not be the "first black president" he will be the first mixed-race president.  And I am so tired of Barack supporters saying that McCain and Palin are "race batting" and that those of us who aren't voting for Barack are racist....

2) Barack's Associtations and friends:  William Ayers, Rev. J Wright, Tony Rezko, Jim Johnson, Frank Raines.  An unrepentant domestic terroritst,  an antisemit, and two crooks walk into a bar.. wait its not a joke, its Obama's freinds, mentores, and economic adivisers....  "But he  didn't know that Ayers bombed places and he was only eight, and he never hear J Wright say those things and you only bring up Raines because he's black..."  Whatever.  I think that if I were running for president I'd make sure that my associations and friends had cleaner backgrounds...  Oh but lets not forget that McCain was indicted in the Keating Five scandle and may have been involved in the Iran-Contra affair....

3) "Four more years of Bush":  This is just nonsense.  McCain has voted party line 90% of the time... Barack 96%....  If there was a sitting Dem. president who was as unpopular as Bush and Obama was extolling "hope" and "change" we would probably have never heard about his opponents voting record...

4) "We need to get out of Iraq":  The idea that we are "losing to many men i n war we should have never been in" is crazy.  We have lost less men in Iraq than we did during the Tet offensive in 'Nam.  This is a volunteer army, not drafted.  That means that these men and women volunteered to serve and knew the risks when they signed up.. when the reenlisted............  But, lets follow Barack's lead and bomb Pakistan, our ally.....

There is more, but it's getting late and I've got a bit of a cold and I'm not feeling very well right now so I think I'm gonna just leave it at these four... for now....
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I just gotta say this... about the coming revolution!

Liberals are painting a lovely picture of what our future may look like; everyone has a job, everyone has health care, everyone has affordable housing, everyone has a green car to drive, and everyone is somehow safe, secure and happy.... at least on the surface.

But, what freedoms do liberals expect us to “sacrifice” (which seems to be one of their favorite words) or what must we “patriotically” endure to enjoy this “Brave New Deal.” I have a few ideas. The Freedom of Speech technically eradicated by things such as the “Fairness Doctrine”; the Right to Bear Arms completely eradicated by excessive gun control laws; the Right to Peaceful (please define “peaceful” as many liberal protests are hardly “peaceful” anymore) Assembly eradicated by watchdog groups such as ACORN and the ACLU (which I both like and dislike for various reasons) who just “want to make sure that EVERYONE is treated fairly” as long as EVERYONE is a liberal, a minority, or another member of the proletariat; the right to NOT have an abortion if the child will be born with any birth defects or impairments (think Downs Syndrome or Autism) because the government will be paying for health care; the freedom to be wealthy (after all, if Exxon is making “excessive profits” at a profit margin of less than 7%, then god forbid anyone else make that kind of profit); and many other unforeseeable losses of freedoms... Oh “Brave New Deal” with such people in it!

Can you imagine this world? If not, then just think of places like Communist Russia in its heyday or Communist China (which Barack thinks is a shining example of great infrastructure).

I can also imagine the reactions of people much like myself; gun toting, freedom loving, capitalist pigs (oink oink baby!). Our founding fathers never thought that the government they set in place with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights would ever last this long... which it almost didn't except for the unconstitutional actions of one very famous and revered President named Abe Lincoln (heresy some will undoubtedly say, followed quickly by the use of the words bigot and racist, but I honestly believe that the southern states had the right to secession if they felt that the government was giving them a raw deal.)

Do not doubt, the Revolution is coming. There will be change. But by God it might not be the change Barack and his socialist buddies want or expect. That I can assure you. That I promise you. For if MY nation does become the Unites Socialist States of America, then I will do everything in my power to tear it down brick by brick, even if it means my death and the deaths of those I hold dear. I will call on others like myself to join with me and stand for what is good and right in this country and overthrow this new form of tyranny no matter what the cost, no matter what the sacrifice! On election day join me as I vote against those who hope to change our country into something it should never be and will never be. Vote for freedom, not for socialism....

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I just gotta say this... about third party candidates

We all know they are out there.  The Green Party, The Libertarians, The American Nazi Party, etc. etc.....  But, unfortunately, in a national election, especially that of President, these contenders mean very little in the grand scheme of things and often may cause the election to turn out much differently than expected.  Some will vote for a third party because they are affiliated with that party and others because they can not support either of the "main stream" parties candidates.  With exception to those with party affiliation I think everyone else either needs to vote for their registered party's candidate of else decide which id the lesser of the two evils.  in this case you have McCain who is a slightly left leaning Republican and Barack who is so far left that he cant even see McCain's position...  To me the choice is easy its either McCain and we have to deal with a few liberal policies or Barack and we become the Unites Socialist States of America....
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I just gotta say this... about liberals

I work with a few Democrats, actually I'm one of the only Republicans where I work.  One of them is a woman, one is an older white male, one is a younger black male and the other an older black male.  The woman, a mother of one, has decided that she "doesn't care who wins as long as they will actually fix thing" and make things better, but she kind of supports the McCain/Palin ticket because she was impressed by Sarah Palin.  I've been constantly feeding her information gathered from not only Townhall.com but also from my favorite conservative talk radio shows like Rush, Boorts, and Hannity...

The younger black male doesnt really talk polotics much and I have an honest gut feeling that he is voting for Barack just because Barack is black.  Why i feel this way is actually very simple.  I asked who he was voting for, he said Barack, I said WHY? and he said that he just thinks Barack is going to do good things for the country.... No real political backing and I really didnt push the subject because, well because I didn't want to get all super political with a guy I have to work wihth every day.

The older black male backs Barack H Obama as well and cites the Clinton Presidnecy as his reason why he supports Democrats, although I have heard him mutter the occasional reference to no helping the brothers in da hood.... or something like that...

The older white male, who has a PolySci degree from a state univeristy (UNCW... and we all know how liberal that school is), once said "I'd vote for SATAN if he ran on the Democratic ticket."  That shocked me.  It shocked me so bad that I couldn't even frame a response to it right off the top of my head.  He not only thinks that Clinton was the greatest presidnet ever, but also refered to the Illuminati and the Free Masons and pointed out that there have only been two Presidents who were not members of the Free Masons... JFK and guess who.. William Jefferson Clinton....  Now, me personally I dont usualy base my arguments for voting off of such political rhetoric as the Illuminati and the consipracy for world domination that it is supposed to represent... but hey i guess if you can subscribe to that theory then you must also subscribe to the theory that Slick Willy knew that Al Gore didn't stand a snowball's chance of winning the election and therefore ruined the economy to prevent the Republicans from holding office for more than four years and that he then sabatoged his own wife's campaign to prevent her from gaining equality with him... which i know a few conservatives who just might agree with those statements... but very few liberals....

Oh and just in case we all havent heard this nonsenss yet, come November 4th he just might be voting for Satan or well The Antichrist at least..  Yes, this theory is out as well.  Barack H Obama comes out of no where to gain political power and quickly moves up the ranks...  But I digress this is all just right Wing fear mongering, which is only fair seeing as how the left would love us to beleive that McCain is Bush 3 and that he will keep us in Iraq for 100 years.....

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I just gotta say this... about the election.

Ok.  So this if my first blog.. ever.  I know, a 22 year old with only one blog ever and its on a conservative web site... Odd?  Maybe.

I've been following this election since about this time last year.  I have severed ties with other online communities due to "flame wars" started because of this election and I will not return to these communities because of things that were said about me because of my political views.  For instance, I was called a racist, a sexist, a bigot, a narrow minded neocon and other distasteful things because I had avowed to note vote for either Hilary Clinton or Barack H Obama.  I've said it before and will say it again; if either of those two were conservatives, not even conservative Republicans just conservative in general, I would vote for them.  Does that make me racist?  Sexist?  If so we must now define liberals as a new race and sex of people...  And if we do that then i guess i am a recist, sexist capitalis pig (oink oink baby!)  And, continuing with that line of thought I now must charge Hilary and Barack with playing the sexy race card... or is it racey sex card?  oh well....  And neocon... that a worst insult to me than racist or sexist... I am not a neo-conservative... I may be "new" in some sence to upholding conservative views and principals.... but I am not one of these neocons who have invaded the Republican party after leaving the Dems.....  By the way, if i'm a sexist, than how come on November 4th I will most definetly be casting my ballot for McCain/Palin....?  Riddle me that...

I was never a big suppoter of McCain.  I think he is at times to liberal and to willing to work across the aisle, but he is better than Barack H Obama.  Just curious, is it ok for me to refer to him as Barack H Obama, or is that in some way racist?  I dont really care, because if it is then I have a lot of people that I want to contact and let them know that they are racists because they refer to Pres. Bush as "Dubya"... or mabey thats nameist... I can invent words to... maybe I can be President one day...  Anywho... there I go rambling on again.

The fact of the matter is this; I WILL NOT voter for a man who wants socialized health care, who promises to "lower" taxes on 95% of Americans, and whos running mate says that paying higher taxes is patriotic...  I guess that makes me more patriotic than Barack or Joe because it just so happens that they make just less than what they consider "rich" as which is $250,000... and they make about $200,000... isnt that odd... opppps there I go again rambling, of course I am writing this after working all day and it is after !:00 AM right now...I think I'm gonna go get some sleep and see if i cant put together a well structured sentence in the morning... even in this "state of mind" I know that there arenst 57 states in the union...
Good night and God speed... (that isnt copyrighted is it?)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »